Editor reviews are provided by professional editors who evaluate a blog based on the following criteria: Frequency of Updates, Relevance of Content, Site Design, and Writing Style.
User rating is calculated as an average of the user ratings. If this rating differs significantly from our editor's rating our editors may re-evaluate this blog.
A 6.8? I see sites with absolute crap for content getting 7s and higher. What's the criteria you guys go by? Makes little sense to me. Blogfish is a thoughtful, well-written, focused blog that deserves a higher rank. And I just gave it one.