Editor reviews are provided by professional editors who evaluate a blog based on the following criteria: Frequency of Updates, Relevance of Content, Site Design, and Writing Style.
We have posted frequently about threats to the integrity of the clinical evidence-based, and to the practice of evidence-based medicine. In particular, we have discussed how research may be manipulated in favor of vested interests, or suppressed when...
We recently discussed the severe challenges to evidence-based medicine presented by manipulation and suppression of clinical research to serve vested interests. I recently (and unfortunately belatedly) came upon yet another example of suppression of...
Recently, we posted about misadventures of the leadership of biotechnology giant Genzyme. Although the company has long priced its drug Cerezyme for the rare Gaucher's disease at a stratospheric level, it did not sufficiently reinvest money in its...
We have repeatedly argued why comparative effectiveness research, under ideal circumstances, would be a good idea. As I said before:
Physicians spend a lot of time trying to figure out the best treatments for particular patients' problems. Doing so is...
Continuing with our annals of health care crime, Bloomberg.com reported a new verdict on a very old case:
Former McKesson Corp. Chairman Charles McCall was convicted in a second trial of participating in a fraud 10 years ago that cost investors $8.6...