... . So on this fine morning on the first of November of this year, I have come up with some musings of Mandelbrotian vs Gaussian aspects of the world. 1) Suppose that you are a Gaussian dogmatist, and your Gaussian beliefs have a sort of high degree of correlation to the curve, as metaphorically depicted below in the modified graphic. Reality is the underlying fractal, and the red bell curve is how ...

... property, never wholly attainable. At this point, the nihilism of a subjectivist and the dogmatism of an intrinsicist converge, as they always do. For both, truth is something that has nothing to do with reality – for a dogmatist, truth is other-worldly, while for a subjectivist, truth does not exist. This view lays waste to any concepts, including that of liberty. In the hazy world of the ...

... case of North Cobb High School it's a two-thousand-six-hundred-eight-ring circus. One less now that Jonathan has permanently withdrawn. Not a comfortable environment for a dogmatist. The risk of confusing education with indoctrination or dogmatic learning is that you produce dynamically illiterate individuals. The impacts of dynamic illiteracy are at this very moment negatively impacting a ...

Peter Wehner: What we are finding is that Barack Obama is not a practical character; he is a dogmatist. He has avoided what’s needed and beneficial in order to promote a sweeping statist agenda. He is turning out to be an ideologue instead of a statesman. Hence Obama and his minions are concentrating on spending even more

Peter Wehner sums up the already determined legacy of Obama: "What we are finding is that Barack Obama is not a practical character; he is a dogmatist. He has avoided what’s needed and beneficial in order to promote a sweeping statist agenda. He is turning out to be an ideologue instead of a statesman. The enormous goodwill the president had at the beginning of the year has evaporated. ...

... . Well, it remains to be seen how rescued we are at the end of the day, but in the meantime let us muse on whether the author of 1 Tim. 2:12 was a rigid dogmatist or not. And what is the halfway point between rigid dogmatism and anything goes pluralism anyway? Is it "some but not all things go" pluralism? The foreword is by our old friend Brian McLaren. He introduces the book as " ...